Have a look at this quote from the article (I know it's the DM but I'll take it as reliable).
She said: ‘When I went to Syria, I was just a housewife. I just stayed at home and looked after my kids. I didn’t do anything dangerous. I never made propaganda, I never encouraged people to come to Syria. They don’t have proof that I did anything dangerous.’
"They don't have proof" says it all - she's a conniving and dangerous terrorist and must not be allowed back. I'm usually quite prepared to accept an honest mistake, if she'd made one, but she shoots herself in the foot (no pun intended) every time she opens her mouth.
No, don't bring her here. She would only get a slap on the wrist with a wet lettuce leaf, and then be allowed to go free (unless Corbyn is PM by then, in which case even the wet lettuce leaf wouldn't be needed).
She committed the alleged crimes over there in Syria, so she should be dealt with under the local system of justice, in Syria.
Presumably stoning to death, chopping off limbs and so on are available as punishments.
Hmmm... I wonder if that's why she wants to come 'home' to the UK....